Republicans try to block election reform, Amazon Twitter army, UK Queen protected from looted artefacts law, Amazon drivers
The New Yorker citing a recording of a Jan. 8 call between a policy adviser to McConnell and the leaders of several conservative groups.
The participants conceded that the bill, which would stem the flow of dark money, was so popular that it wasn’t worth trying to mount a public-advocacy campaign. Instead, a senior Koch operative said that opponents would be better off trying to kill the bill in Congress.
The Intercept citing 2018 Amazon documents produced under the codename “Veritas."
Anticipating criticisms of worker conditions at their fulfillment centers in particular, Amazon designed Veritas to train fulfillment center workers chosen for their “great sense of humor” to confront critics — including policymakers — on Twitter in a “blunt” manner.
The document, produced as part of the pilot program in 2018 and marked “Amazon.com Confidential,” also includes examples of how its ambassadors can snarkily respond to criticisms of the company and its CEO. Several examples involve Sen. Bernie Sanders, a longtime critic of the $1 trillion firm who has been targeted by it in recent days. It also provides examples of how to defend Bezos.
The Guardian citing documents obtained through FOIA requests.
The culture minister’s private secretary, who was not named, stated that the draft bill had been carefully phrased when it referred to the Queen’s special exemption. “Separately, we wish to ensure that the powers of part 4 of the bill are not exercisable in relation to Her Majesty’s private estates,” the official wrote.
The Intercept citing Amazon policy documents.
One document from January, marked “Amazon Confidential,” details various infractions by Amazon employees, including “public urination” and “public defecation.” The document was provided to The Intercept by an Amazon employee in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, who, like most of the employees I talked to, was granted anonymity to avoid professional reprisal.
The words "according to documents" in a news story signal investigative journalism of the highest caliber.
We want to celebrate reporting based on government or corporate reports, emails, private chat messages or something equally tangible—as opposed to that based on unnamed sources or rumors.
The idea is imperfect, of course, and some excellent reporting will be based on no documents and some terrible reporting will be based on many documents. But ultimately, it's a great rule of thumb.
Got a suggestion?
Help us highlight worthwhile reporting by submitting it on our website or emailing us (hit reply!). We welcome work by freelancers, smaller publications and journalists covering underreported issues or countries.
If you liked this post from According To Documents, why not share it?